TVG Governance

Source Standards

How TVG prioritises evidence, attributes provider announcements and separates verified facts from editorial interpretation.

Last updated: 6 August 2026Applies to reviews, news, comparisons and research reports

Evidence hierarchy

Highest priority

Primary and official sources

Regulator registers, legal documents, official provider terms, fee schedules, platform documentation and direct company announcements.

Supporting evidence

Independent secondary sources

Reputable reporting, established industry research and clearly identified user-review data used with appropriate caution.

Claims, estimates and inference

Provider claim: attributed to the provider and not automatically treated as an independently verified fact.
Editorial assessment: identified as TVG's interpretation under the published methodology.
Estimate or indicative figure: labelled as such and accompanied by the date or assumptions where practical.
Material uncertainty: disclosed rather than filled with unsupported certainty.

Freshness and review dates

Material facts such as legal entities, regulation, fees, promotions, payout rules and country eligibility can change. TVG uses review dates as editorial timestamps, not guarantees that every term remains current after publication.

Reader verification: Before opening, funding or purchasing, confirm the current legal entity, client agreement, fees, eligibility and risk warning directly with the provider and relevant official register.

Corrections

Readers and providers may report a material factual concern through the contact route stated in TVG's Corrections Policy. Requests for favourable language, rankings or removal of substantiated criticism are not treated as factual corrections.